Religion expert Ryan Burge told JimHeath.TV yesterday that Muslims make up slightly less than .05 percent of the American population, and their numbers are not growing.

But if you listened only to Donald Trump, you’d be convinced there’s a Muslim around every corner just waiting to take your freedoms away.

As long as Trump has focused on what he said was the danger lurking at the southwestern border (and Mexicans), he has also talked about the supposed threat from one specific group already in the country: Muslims.

During the 2016 campaign, he would not rule out creating a registry of Muslims in the United States.

He claimed to have seen “thousands” of Muslims cheering on rooftops in New Jersey after Sept. 11, a statement that was widely debunked.

After deadly attacks in Paris and California, Trump called for a moratorium on Muslims traveling to the United States.

Now, with 19 months until the 2020 election, Trump is seeking to rally his base by sounding that theme once again.

And this time, he has a specific target: Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat of Minnesota and one of the first Muslim women elected to Congress.

Trump and his team are trying to make Omar, one of a group of progressive female Democratic House members who are relatively unknown in national politics, a household name, to be seen as the most prominent voice of the Democratic Party, regardless of her actual position.

And they are gambling that there will be limited downside in doing so.

Trump is banking on painting the entire Democratic Party as extreme.

And Omar has become a point of contention for some members of her own party, after remarks she made about the Israel lobby were condemned as anti-Semitic by some long-serving Democrats, as well as by Republicans and Trump.

But Trump’s electoral success in 2016 was based partly on culture wars and fears among an older, white voting base that the country it knew was slipping away.

Like his hard line on immigration, his plays on fears of Muslims — including inaccurately conflating them with terrorists — proved polarizing among the wider electorate, but helped him keep a tight grip on his most enthusiastic voters.

As he looks toward 2020, he is betting that electoral play can deliver for him again.

It is a strategy that risks summoning dark forces in American society, a point Omar made in a statement Sunday evening.

“Since the president’s tweet Friday evening, I have experienced an increase in direct threats on my life — many directly referencing or replying to the president’s video,” Omar said. “This is endangering lives. It has to stop.”

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Sunday that she had requested a review of Omar’s security, while Trump aides insisted that the president meant no harm.

“Certainly the president is wishing no ill will and certainly not violence towards anyone,” Sarah Huckabee Sanders, White House press secretary, said Sunday.

Privately, Trump’s advisers describe Omar as his ideal foil.

Her remarks about the power of the pro-Israel lobby in the United States, combined with her role in a progressive contingent of freshman House Democrats who have sparked intraparty battles, have been treated as a gift by Republicans.

Trump aides and allies say they are pleased that some of the Democratic hopefuls for the 2020 presidential nomination are defending her against the president’s attacks, claiming they think it will be damaging for them in the general election.

Omar “is the perfect embodiment of the sharp contrast President Trump wants to paint for 2020,” said Sam Nunberg, a 2016 campaign aide to Trump.

He added that Trump is tethering Omar to more visible Democrats, like her closest ally in Congress, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, whom Republicans have sought to make a boogeyman.

“This contrast gives the president a chance to expand his support closer to 50 percent,” Nunberg insisted.

But on Sunday, Democrats said Trump was diving into an issue on which he has a shaky standing.

“He has no moral authority to be talking about 9/11 at all,” said Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY).

Nadler noted that Trump’s real estate company applied for and received grants after the attacks that were intended for small businesses affected by the devastation.

The attack was not Trump’s first on Omar.

Despite repeatedly being denounced for not making forceful condemnations of white nationalists who traffic in anti-Semitism, the president pounced when Omar unleashed a firestorm in February with her comments on Israel, rejecting her subsequent apology and calling for her to resign.

“Congressman Omar is terrible, what she said,” Trump told reporters.

Geoff Garin, a veteran Democratic strategist, said the Democratic presidential candidates who had responded to Trump’s latest attacks on Omar were keeping the focus on his tactics.

And he predicted that the use of such graphic images from one of the nation’s darkest days would backfire for the president.

“Voters are turned off by the use of 9/11 for political purposes, and my guess is that moderate voters are going to see Trump’s use of that as both ugly and extreme,” Garin said. “I think his over-the-top exploitation of 9/11 is going to turn more voters off than he wins over by attacking the Democrats on this.”

 

Attribution:The New York Times
Subscribe To Jim Heath TV

Subscribe To Jim Heath TV

Join our mailing list to receive the latest fact news and election updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This